William Smith
Impact in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Parasitic infections in humans and animals
- Neurology top 5%
Papers in
- Genetics 5
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 4
- Co-authors
- Hidezo Yoshizawa (1 shared paper)John Patrick O'Brien (1 shared paper)E. Lynn Jones (7 shared papers)Dorene D. Ross (1 shared paper)Myre Sim (3 shared papers)Folakemi T. Odedina (3 shared papers)Olihe Nnenna Okoro (3 shared papers)C. E. Searle (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (7 papers)The Journal of Pathology (5 papers)Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (4 papers)Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning (3 papers)Brain (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesVenezuela
In The Last Decade
William Smith
53 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 300
- Neurology 185
- Genetics 77
- Pharmacology 119
- Neurology 51
Countries citing papers authored by William Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of William Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Smith. The network helps show where William Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 184 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 72 | |
| 3 | 1965 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1952 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1966 | 57 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 53 | |
| 7 | 1966 | 50 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 50 | |
| 9 | 1965 | 43 | |
| 10 | 1977 | 41 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 12 | 1966 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 15 | 1974 | 34 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 17 | 1961 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 19 | 1954 | 24 | |
| 20 | 1971 | 24 |
About William Smith
William Smith is a scholar working on Neurology, Genetics, General Health Professions, Clinical Biochemistry and Rheumatology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (3 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (3 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers) and Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (300 citations), Neurology (185 citations), Genetics (77 citations), Pharmacology (119 citations) and Neurology (51 citations). William Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Venezuela. Frequent co-authors include Hidezo Yoshizawa, John Patrick O'Brien, E. Lynn Jones, Dorene D. Ross, Myre Sim, Folakemi T. Odedina, Olihe Nnenna Okoro, C. E. Searle, J.M. French and Rufino Ermocilla. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, The Journal of Pathology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning and Brain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.