William Seager

54 papers receiving 583 citations

Peers

William Seager
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • History and Philosophy of Science 208
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 281
  • Philosophy 200
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 188
  • General Psychology 13
Replace Kenneth M. Sayre with:
Kenneth M. Sayre United States
George Berkeley Australia
Kevin Mulligan Switzerland
P. Suppes United States
Jay F. Rosenberg United States
Daniel A. Weiskopf United States
Jeffrey L. Nunemacher United States
Leon Horsten United Kingdom
Russell Revlin United States
Michiel van Lambalgen Netherlands
William Seager relative to Kenneth M. Sayre United States Kenneth M. Sayre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Kenneth M. Sayre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Seager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Seager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Seager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Seager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Seager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Seager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Seager. The network helps show where William Seager may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside William Seager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Seager Line = papers co-authored together William Seager links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996247
2 200849
3
The 'intrinsic nature' argument for panpsychism
200642
4 200239
5 200939
6 201628
7 201626
8 200223
9
TV-centricity - requirements gathering for triple play services
200716
10 200715
11 200713
12 201212
13 201811
14 199510
15 20129
16 19889
17 19918
18 20117
19 20087
20 20127

About William Seager

William Seager is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 71 papers that have together received 722 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (23 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (7 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (5 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (208 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (281 citations), Philosophy (200 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (188 citations) and General Psychology (13 citations). William Seager has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jaegwon Kim, Hendrik Knoche, Pablo S. Cesar, Jack Jansen, David Geerts, Dick C. A. Bulterman, Martina Angela Sasse, David Bourget, Manuel Oliveira and George Hunter. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Philosophy of Science, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Journal of Consciousness Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact