William Schworm

509 citations
18 papers · 280 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William Schworm

18 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

William Schworm
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 80
  • Management Science and Operations Research 111
  • Economics and Econometrics 197
  • Finance 31
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22
Replace Emir Malikov with:
Emir Malikov United States
Yves Aragon France
René Fruit
Bert G. Hickman United States
Mustafa Dinc United States
Swarnjit S. Arora United States
Erwin Diewert Canada
Robert M. Coen United States
Michael R. Donihue United States
William Schworm relative to Emir Malikov United States Emir Malikov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Emir Malikov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Schworm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Schworm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Schworm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Schworm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Schworm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Schworm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Schworm. The network helps show where William Schworm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside William Schworm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Schworm Line = papers co-authored together William Schworm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200837
2 201136
3 198825
4 198223
5 199123
6 198319
7 201716
8 199314
9 198414
10 199114
11 197913
12 200811
13 198011
14 20118
15 19937
16 19835
17 19803
18 20091

About William Schworm

William Schworm is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance and Management Information Systems, having authored 18 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (8 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (5 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (3 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (3 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (2 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (80 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (111 citations), Economics and Econometrics (197 citations), Finance (31 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (22 citations). William Schworm has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles Blackorby, R. Robert Russell, Russell Davidson, Walter Bossert, Anthony J. Venables and E. Roy Weintraub. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of Economic Studies, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique, Journal of Public Economics and International Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact