WILLIAM SCHULZ

28 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

WILLIAM SCHULZ
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Health 227
  • Modeling and Simulation 26
  • Infectious Diseases 60
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 34
  • Epidemiology 53
Replace Maude Dionne with:
Maude Dionne Canada
Yoshiko Yamamoto Japan
Mariam Alsanafi Kuwait
Alberto Lontano Italy
Fengling Feng China
Savannah Hughes United States
Nguyen United States
Francesco Aquino Italy
Stephen Reicher United Kingdom
WILLIAM SCHULZ relative to Maude Dionne Canada Maude Dionne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Maude Dionne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by WILLIAM SCHULZ

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of WILLIAM SCHULZ's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by WILLIAM SCHULZ with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites WILLIAM SCHULZ more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by WILLIAM SCHULZ

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by WILLIAM SCHULZ. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by WILLIAM SCHULZ. The network helps show where WILLIAM SCHULZ may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside WILLIAM SCHULZ, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with WILLIAM SCHULZ Line = papers co-authored together WILLIAM SCHULZ links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015259
2 200341
3 200717
4 20025
5 20005
6
The Smithsonian Institution, a world of discovery : an exploration of behind-the-scenes research in the arts, sciences, and humanities
19933
7 19963
8 19952
9 19982
10 19952
11 19972
12 20022
13 20032
14 20251
15 20241
16 19961
17 19961
18 20101
19 19961
20 19961

About WILLIAM SCHULZ

WILLIAM SCHULZ is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (3 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (2 papers), Chemical Safety and Risk Management (2 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper), Heat shock proteins research (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (227 citations), Modeling and Simulation (26 citations), Infectious Diseases (60 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (34 citations) and Epidemiology (53 citations). WILLIAM SCHULZ has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Peretti‐Watel, Jeremy K. Ward, Heidi J. Larson, Christina Delgado, Ramón L. Sánchez, Thomas G. Douglass, H. Terry Wepsic, Martin R. Jadus, Yijun Chen and DAVID J. HANSON. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Gene Therapy, Journal of Experimental Political Science, Political Analysis, PLoS Currents and Science Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact