William Sacksteder
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy and History of Science
-
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Papers in
- Philosophy 13
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 11
- Marxism and Critical Theory 5
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 3
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 3
- Co-authors
- Max Black (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3 papers)Journal of the history of philosophy (3 papers)Ethics (2 papers)Philosophy of Science (2 papers)Philosophy and Rhetoric (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Sacksteder
20 papers receiving 456 citations
William Sacksteder's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- History and Philosophy of Science 89
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 198
- Philosophy 174
- Language and Linguistics 75
- General Psychology 7
Countries citing papers authored by William Sacksteder
This map shows the geographic impact of William Sacksteder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Sacksteder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Sacksteder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Sacksteder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Sacksteder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Sacksteder. The network helps show where William Sacksteder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside William Sacksteder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Hit paper breakdown → | 1962 | 514 |
| 2 | 1978 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 4 | 1980 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 11 | |
| 6 | Analogy: Justification for Logic | 1979 | 9 |
| 7 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 8 | The Logic of Analogy. | 1974 | 8 |
| 9 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1963 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1981 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1977 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1963 | 1 |
About William Sacksteder
William Sacksteder is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 27 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (11 papers), Marxism and Critical Theory (5 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (4 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (3 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper), History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper) and Construction Project Management and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (89 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (198 citations), Philosophy (174 citations), Language and Linguistics (75 citations) and General Psychology (7 citations). William Sacksteder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Max Black. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Journal of the history of philosophy, Ethics, Philosophy of Science and Philosophy and Rhetoric.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.