J D Bastable

3.2k citations
79 papers · 1.5k · 1 hit paper · h-index 17

Impact in

    • Historical Philosophy and Science
    • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophy top 0.5%
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy

Papers in

    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 6
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 5
    • Augustinian Studies and Theology 5
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 2
    • Catholicism and Religious Studies 7
Journals
Irish Theological Quarterly (1 paper)Philosophical Studies (78 papers)

In The Last Decade

J D Bastable

61 papers receiving 816 citations

J D Bastable's Hit Papers

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 1961 · 634 citations
6340+21+43Years since publication200400600

Peers

J D Bastable
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • History and Philosophy of Science 301
  • Philosophy 633
  • Classics 104
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 229
  • Theoretical Computer Science 20
Replace Peter Heath with:
Peter Heath United States
Aquinas Thomas Germany
John W. Yolton United States
Maurice Mandelbaum United States
Eva Schaper United Kingdom
Joseph Owens United States
William Smith United States
George Boas Greece
Brian Vickers United Kingdom
Paul Oskar Kristeller United States
J D Bastable relative to Peter Heath United States Peter Heath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Peter Heath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J D Bastable

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J D Bastable's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J D Bastable with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J D Bastable more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J D Bastable

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J D Bastable. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J D Bastable. The network helps show where J D Bastable may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Hit paper breakdown →
1961634
2 1964123
3 195788
4 196679
5 196147
6 196442
7 195839
8 196539
9 195729
10 196429
11 196827
12 195623
13 195821
14 196520
15 196418
16 195716
17 196116
18 195615
19 196413
20 196110

About J D Bastable

J D Bastable is a scholar working on Philosophy, History, History and Philosophy of Science, Classics and Religious studies, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Philosophy and Theology (11 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (5 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (5 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (301 citations), Philosophy (633 citations), Classics (104 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (229 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (20 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Irish Theological Quarterly and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact