William R. Katowitz

76 papers receiving 651 citations

Peers

William R. Katowitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Ophthalmology 221
  • Anatomy 13
  • Neurology 114
  • Dermatology 65
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 114
Replace Fenwick C. Riley with:
Fenwick C. Riley United States
H. Sprague Eustis United States
Rona Z. Silkiss United States
Frederick M. Wang United States
S Morax France
Russell W. Neuhaus United States
George B. Bartley United States
S A Sadiq United Kingdom
O. Galatoire France
Francesco P. Bernardini Italy
William R. Katowitz relative to Fenwick C. Riley United States Fenwick C. Riley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.2×
Fenwick C. Riley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William R. Katowitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Katowitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Katowitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Katowitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Katowitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Katowitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Katowitz. The network helps show where William R. Katowitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William R. Katowitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William R. Katowitz Line = papers co-authored together William R. Katowitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201766
2 201264
3 200854
4 200949
5 201945
6 201233
7 201429
8 201620
9 201720
10 201919
11 201119
12 201718
13 201717
14 199914
15 201813
16 200913
17
Pilocarpine toxicity in retinal ganglion cells.
199912
18 200810
19 202110
20 20229

About William R. Katowitz

William R. Katowitz is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Surgery, Genetics, Dermatology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 90 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments (26 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (14 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (10 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (8 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (8 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (8 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (6 papers) and Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (221 citations), Anatomy (13 citations), Neurology (114 citations), Dermatology (65 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (114 citations). William R. Katowitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and France. Frequent co-authors include James A. Katowitz, Gil Binenbaum, Christopher B. Chambers, B Fayet, E. Racy, Robert A. Avery, Scott Goldstein, Thomas Moshang, Daphna Landau Prat and Grant T. Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology and Thyroid.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact