Frederick M. Wang

21 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers

Frederick M. Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Ophthalmology 216
  • Dermatology 80
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 140
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 99
  • Genetics 137
Replace Fenwick C. Riley with:
Fenwick C. Riley United States
Francis C. Sutula United States
Bernard Chang United Kingdom
William Rocamora Katowitz United States
Michael Kinori Israel
Konrad R. Koch Germany
Ho Kyung Choung South Korea
Richard L. Dallow United States
Ofira Zloto Israel
H. Sprague Eustis United States
Frederick M. Wang relative to Fenwick C. Riley United States Fenwick C. Riley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Fenwick C. Riley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick M. Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick M. Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick M. Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick M. Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick M. Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick M. Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick M. Wang. The network helps show where Frederick M. Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick M. Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick M. Wang Line = papers co-authored together Frederick M. Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989131
2 1991109
3 201387
4 198772
5 198556
6 198446
7 198839
8 199027
9 197923
10 19889
11 20136
12 19816
13 19885
14 20105
15 20124
16 20182
17 20152
18 20181
19 19901
20 20181

About Frederick M. Wang

Frederick M. Wang is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Genetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (5 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (3 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (2 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (2 papers) and Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (216 citations), Dermatology (80 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (140 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (99 citations) and Genetics (137 citations). Frederick M. Wang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ahmad M. Mansour, Robert Reinecke, John C.K. Barber, Rosalie B. Goldberg, Harvey W. Topilow, Jeffrey Cooper, Erica Schulman, Robert J. Shprintzen, James Randall Patrinely and Jerry C. Jacobs. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus, Ophthalmology, Survey of Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and The Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact