William Pilcher
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
- Occupational Therapy top 5%
- Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Papers in
-
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics 3
-
- Wound Healing and Treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Manoj Bhasin (8 shared papers)Swati S. Bhasin (7 shared papers)Debasree Sarkar (2 shared papers)Beena Thomas (4 shared papers)Hope Mumme (4 shared papers)Valerie Horsley (1 shared paper)Bhakti Dwivedi (1 shared paper)Teresa Sandoval-Schaefer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- iScience (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Frontiers in Endocrinology (1 paper)PLoS Computational Biology (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
William Pilcher
9 papers receiving 293 citations
William Pilcher's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Rehabilitation 151
- Occupational Therapy 41
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 94
- Genetics 46
- Immunology 62
Countries citing papers authored by William Pilcher
This map shows the geographic impact of William Pilcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Pilcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Pilcher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Pilcher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Pilcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Pilcher. The network helps show where William Pilcher may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Pilcher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Single cell transcriptomic landscape of diabetic foot ulcers Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 251 |
| 2 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 |
About William Pilcher
William Pilcher is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Rehabilitation, Hematology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Immunology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (3 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (3 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (151 citations), Occupational Therapy (41 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (94 citations), Genetics (46 citations) and Immunology (62 citations). William Pilcher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Manoj Bhasin, Swati S. Bhasin, Debasree Sarkar, Beena Thomas, Hope Mumme, Valerie Horsley, Bhakti Dwivedi, Teresa Sandoval-Schaefer, Georgios Theocharidis and Antonios Kafanas. Their work appears in journals such as iScience, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Endocrinology, PLoS Computational Biology and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.