William Osborn

976 citations
39 papers · 854 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

William Osborn

38 papers receiving 845 citations

Peers

William Osborn
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 210
  • Catalysis 221
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 160
  • Materials Chemistry 533
  • Condensed Matter Physics 74
Replace Toru Kurabayashi with:
Toru Kurabayashi Japan
P.S. Rudman Israel
Kazuhide Tanaka Japan
Peter A. Duine Netherlands
R. Armitage United States
M.W. Zandbergen Netherlands
A. Ulyashin Norway
M. Egilmez Canada
L. Laversenne France
Masahiro Tosa Japan
William Osborn relative to Toru Kurabayashi Japan Toru Kurabayashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.1×
Toru Kurabayashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Osborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Osborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Osborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Osborn. The network helps show where William Osborn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Osborn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Osborn Line = papers co-authored together William Osborn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012165
2 200662
3 200855
4 200747
5 200644
6 200938
7 200838
8 200737
9 200931
10 201527
11 201425
12 201323
13 200722
14 200822
15 201119
16 201619
17 201719
18 200919
19 201519
20 201717

About William Osborn

William Osborn is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Energy Engineering and Power Technology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 854 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrogen Storage and Materials (14 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (7 papers), Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (7 papers), Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction (6 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (6 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (4 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Energy Engineering and Power Technology (210 citations), Catalysis (221 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (160 citations), Materials Chemistry (533 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (74 citations). William Osborn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Tippawan Markmaitree, Leon L. Shaw, Ruiming Ren, Xuefei Wan, Konrad Rykaczewski, Zuankai Wang, Shuhuai Yao, Wanda Jones, Chonglei Hao and Marlon L. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Power Sources, Ultramicroscopy, Nanotechnology, Journal of Alloys and Compounds and MRS Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact