William Monter
Impact in
Papers in
- History 25
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 15
- European Political History Analysis 5
-
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 3
- Early Modern Spanish Literature 3
- Co-authors
- Lydia G. Cochrane (1 shared paper)Giovanni Levi (1 shared paper)Penny Roberts (1 shared paper)William G. Naphy (1 shared paper)Hans Sebald (1 shared paper)William J. Bouwsma (1 shared paper)Jean‐Pierre Dedieu (1 shared paper)Philip Benedict (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (14 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (10 papers)Sixteenth Century Journal (3 papers)The English Historical Review (1 paper)The Journal of Modern History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- PhilippinesUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
William Monter
32 papers receiving 230 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- History 170
- Classics 27
- History and Philosophy of Science 31
- Religious studies 31
- Anthropology 51
Countries citing papers authored by William Monter
This map shows the geographic impact of William Monter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Monter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Monter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Monter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Monter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Monter. The network helps show where William Monter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside William Monter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 42 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 4 |
About William Monter
William Monter is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory, Demography, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 42 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (15 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (7 papers), European Political History Analysis (5 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (170 citations), Classics (27 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (31 citations), Religious studies (31 citations) and Anthropology (51 citations). William Monter has collaborated with scholars based in Philippines, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lydia G. Cochrane, Giovanni Levi, Penny Roberts, William G. Naphy, Hans Sebald, William J. Bouwsma, Jean‐Pierre Dedieu, Philip Benedict, Euan Cameron and Andrew Pettegree. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Sixteenth Century Journal, The English Historical Review and The Journal of Modern History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.