William Monter
Impact in
Papers in
- History 31
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 19
- European Political History Analysis 6
- Co-authors
- William J. Bouwsma (1 shared paper)Hans Sebald (1 shared paper)Lydia G. Cochrane (1 shared paper)Giovanni Levi (1 shared paper)Penny Roberts (1 shared paper)William G. Naphy (1 shared paper)R. Po‐chia Hsia (1 shared paper)Katalin Péter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (14 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (12 papers)Sixteenth Century Journal (3 papers)The English Historical Review (1 paper)The Historical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippinesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William Monter
36 papers receiving 384 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- History 367
- Classics 84
- Religious studies 87
- History and Philosophy of Science 51
- Anthropology 79
Countries citing papers authored by William Monter
This map shows the geographic impact of William Monter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Monter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Monter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Monter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Monter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Monter. The network helps show where William Monter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Monter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 140 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 102 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 43 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 41 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 22 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 5 |
About William Monter
William Monter is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Demography and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 49 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (19 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (7 papers), European Political History Analysis (6 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (3 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (367 citations), Classics (84 citations), Religious studies (87 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (51 citations) and Anthropology (79 citations). William Monter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William J. Bouwsma, Hans Sebald, Lydia G. Cochrane, Giovanni Levi, Penny Roberts, William G. Naphy, R. Po‐chia Hsia, Katalin Péter, Bob Scribner and Bruce Gordon. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Sixteenth Century Journal, The English Historical Review and The Historical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.