William Mark Moore
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Team Dynamics and Performance
- Mental Health Treatment and Access
Papers in
-
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 5
-
- Labor Movements and Unions 1
- Co-authors
- Paula P. Schnurr (4 shared papers)Kathleen M. Grubbs (3 shared papers)Jeffrey M. Pyne (3 shared papers)John C. Fortney (3 shared papers)Teresa J. Hudson (3 shared papers)Dean E. Robinson (1 shared paper)Timothy A. Kimbrell (1 shared paper)Thomas W. Freeman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Traumatic Stress (1 paper)The Journal of Rural Health (1 paper)Psychiatric Services (1 paper)Journal of Vascular Surgery (1 paper)Cardiology Clinics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
William Mark Moore
10 papers receiving 724 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Clinical Psychology 177
- Social Psychology 152
- Applied Psychology 28
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 171
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 60
Countries citing papers authored by William Mark Moore
This map shows the geographic impact of William Mark Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Mark Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Mark Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Mark Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Mark Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Mark Moore. The network helps show where William Mark Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside William Mark Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 375 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 223 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 55 | |
| 4 | Nutrition, growth, and development of North American Indian children | 1972 | 35 |
| 5 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1981 | 1 |
About William Mark Moore
William Mark Moore is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Administration, Nutrition and Dietetics, Surgery and Social Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 805 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Water Access (1 paper), Indigenous Health and Education (1 paper), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (1 paper), Team Dynamics and Performance (1 paper) and Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (177 citations), Social Psychology (152 citations), Applied Psychology (28 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (171 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (60 citations). William Mark Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paula P. Schnurr, Kathleen M. Grubbs, Jeffrey M. Pyne, John C. Fortney, Teresa J. Hudson, Dean E. Robinson, Timothy A. Kimbrell, Thomas W. Freeman, Merrill S. Read and Terri Julian. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Traumatic Stress, The Journal of Rural Health, Psychiatric Services, Journal of Vascular Surgery and Cardiology Clinics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.