Cardiology Clinics

2.0k papers and 28.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Cardiology Clinics in the last decades have received a total of 28.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Cardiology Clinics usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.4k papers), Surgery (637 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (409 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (384 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (289 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (269 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cardiology Clinics are William B. Kannel, Thomas G. Pickering, Prakash Deedwania, John A. Elefteriades, Robert Fagard, Uri Elkayam, Prediman K. Shah, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Joseph G. Ouzounian and Michael A. Coady.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cardiology Clinics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cardiology Clinics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cardiology Clinics.

Countries where authors publish in Cardiology Clinics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cardiology Clinics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cardiology Clinics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cardiology Clinics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025