William M. McLaughlin

33 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

William M. McLaughlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Ophthalmology 67
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 32
  • Surgery 131
  • Internal Medicine 5
  • Neurology 10
Replace Lukas Bobinski with:
Lukas Bobinski Sweden
Dan Cheng China
Daniel Su United States
Alexander Krasimirov Angelov Bulgaria
Wenbo Li China
Hanno Steinke Germany
Jae Hyung Lee South Korea
Robert Wilkes United States
Yuji Tomori Japan
Zoubir Belkheyar France
William M. McLaughlin relative to Lukas Bobinski Sweden Lukas Bobinski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lukas Bobinski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William M. McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. McLaughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. McLaughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. McLaughlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. McLaughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. McLaughlin. The network helps show where William M. McLaughlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William M. McLaughlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William M. McLaughlin Line = papers co-authored together William M. McLaughlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201741
2 202240
3 201739
4 202221
5 202216
6 202214
7 202214
8 201713
9 202312
10 202310
11 20229
12 20238
13 20238
14 20228
15 20228
16 20217
17 20236
18 20226
19 20225
20 20234

About William M. McLaughlin

William M. McLaughlin is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Ophthalmology and Molecular Biology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (13 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (5 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (3 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (67 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (32 citations), Surgery (131 citations), Internal Medicine (5 citations) and Neurology (10 citations). William M. McLaughlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Jay Moran, Jonathan N. Grauer, Andrew E. Jimenez, Stephen M. Gillinov, Rebecca M. Sappington, Christopher A. Schneble, David J. Calkins, Wendi S. Lambert, Michael J. Medvecky and Michael S. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact