William M. Falls

1.3k citations
28 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

William M. Falls

27 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

William M. Falls
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 757
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 182
  • Neurology 227
  • Sensory Systems 80
  • Neurology 217
Replace R. Maciewicz with:
R. Maciewicz United States
Kamen G. Usunoff Bulgaria
Motohide Takemura Japan
John B. Carman New Zealand
Nobuo Katakura Japan
M Hosoi Japan
Toshiko Tsumori Japan
Haruhide Hayashi Japan
Samuel G. Nord United States
Elizabeth Taber Norway
William M. Falls relative to R. Maciewicz United States R. Maciewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
R. Maciewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Falls

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Falls's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Falls with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Falls more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Falls

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Falls. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Falls. The network helps show where William M. Falls may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside William M. Falls, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William M. Falls Line = papers co-authored together William M. Falls links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980195
2 1982127
3 198974
4 197968
5 198367
6 197359
7 197953
8 198548
9 198441
10 197638
11 197638
12 198437
13 199133
14 198932
15 200830
16 199126
17 198625
18 197618
19 198318
20 198416

About William M. Falls

William M. Falls is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (18 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (9 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (757 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (182 citations), Neurology (227 citations), Sensory Systems (80 citations) and Neurology (217 citations). William M. Falls has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Gobel, Kevin D. Phelan, S.T. Kitai, James S. King, Gary J. Bennett, Emma Humphrey, Haruhide Hayashi, M Abdelmoumène, George F. Martin and Richard Dom. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Neuroscience, Brain Research, Neuroendocrinology and Experimental Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact