William Limm

21 papers receiving 660 citations

Peers

William Limm
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 203
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 24
  • Pollution 97
  • Environmental Chemistry 80
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 194
Replace Xiaotong Li with:
Xiaotong Li China
Thierry Fouquet Japan
Michael W. Heaven Australia
Mustapha Hilali Morocco
Carl W. Isaacson United States
Anju Hooda India
Fen Liu China
Alina Adams Germany
François Bilodeau Canada
Avery E. Lindeman United States
William Limm relative to Xiaotong Li China Xiaotong Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Xiaotong Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Limm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Limm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Limm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Limm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Limm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Limm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Limm. The network helps show where William Limm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Limm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Limm Line = papers co-authored together William Limm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984120
2 1996119
3 201072
4 202272
5 198271
6 199537
7 198832
8 201231
9 201829
10 202322
11 200819
12 198518
13 198513
14 200712
15 200612
16 19869
17 20148
18 20214
19 19892
20 19892

About William Limm

William Limm is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Polymers and Plastics, Food Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 21 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polymer crystallization and properties (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (2 papers), Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (2 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (2 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (203 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (24 citations), Pollution (97 citations), Environmental Chemistry (80 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (194 citations). William Limm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Henry C. Hollifield, Martin Moskovits, D. P. DiLella, Timothy H. Begley, Sanjeewa R. Karunathilaka, Magdi M. Mossoba, R. H. Lipson, Christine M. Fisher, Gregory O. Noonan and Luke K. Ackerman. Their work appears in journals such as Food Additives & Contaminants, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Food Additives & Contaminants Part A, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Journal of AOAC International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact