William L. Cull

57 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

William L. Cull
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Gender Studies 290
  • General Health Professions 452
  • Speech and Hearing 90
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 182
  • Emergency Medical Services 88
Replace Steven H. Day with:
Steven H. Day United States
Marianne Carlsson Sweden
Philip Zazove United States
Marita R. Inglehart United States
Hilary K. Brown Canada
Nicole J. Borges United States
Ross Shegog United States
Susan R. Swing United States
Christy Boscardin United States
Annemarie Jutel New Zealand
William L. Cull relative to Steven H. Day United States Steven H. Day's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Steven H. Day · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Cull

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Cull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Cull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Cull more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Cull

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Cull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Cull. The network helps show where William L. Cull may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William L. Cull, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William L. Cull Line = papers co-authored together William L. Cull links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005349
2 2000182
3 2010115
4 200990
5 201979
6 200078
7 201776
8 199673
9 200265
10 201662
11 200361
12 200260
13 200556
14 199549
15 201243
16 200943
17 200342
18 200037
19 201035
20 199435

About William L. Cull

William L. Cull is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Artificial Intelligence, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (290 citations), General Health Professions (452 citations), Speech and Hearing (90 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (182 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (88 citations). William L. Cull has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Karen G. O’Connor, Mary Pat Frintner, Suk‐fong S. Tang, Lynn Olson, Eugene B. Zechmeister, Richard Pan, Holly J. Mulvey, Sarah E. Brotherton, Beth K. Yudkowsky and Scott A. Shipman. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Academic Pediatrics, The Journal of Pediatrics, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Academic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact