William K. Boardman

415 citations
22 papers · 356 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William K. Boardman

20 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

William K. Boardman
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 129
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 184
  • Music 17
  • General Decision Sciences 10
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 52
Replace Janet D. Proctor with:
Janet D. Proctor United States
Simon Tobin Canada
J. C. Read United Kingdom
Rita Senf United States
Sophie Fayolle France
Roy M. Hamlin United States
Katherine Kipp Harnishfeger United States
Donna Bryce Germany
Ruth L. Ault United States
William K. Boardman relative to Janet D. Proctor United States Janet D. Proctor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Janet D. Proctor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William K. Boardman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William K. Boardman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William K. Boardman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William K. Boardman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William K. Boardman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William K. Boardman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William K. Boardman. The network helps show where William K. Boardman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside William K. Boardman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William K. Boardman Line = papers co-authored together William K. Boardman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195979
2 195845
3 195842
4 195829
5 195728
6 196223
7 196213
8 195713
9 196211
10 195710
11 197510
12 19599
13 19629
14 19628
15 19636
16 19725
17 19754
18 19644
19 19593
20 19753

About William K. Boardman

William K. Boardman is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Education Methods and Practices (1 paper) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (129 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (184 citations), Music (17 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (52 citations). William K. Boardman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sanford Goldstone, William T. Lhamon, Lawrence G. Calhoun, Richard E. Johnson, David J. Wright and J. Ray Hays. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Psychology, Journal of Personality Assessment, The Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Clinical Psychology and British Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact