William Jonas

572 citations
8 papers · 410 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

William Jonas

8 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

William Jonas
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Statistics and Probability 122
  • Health 72
  • Internal Medicine 23
  • Hematology 66
  • Management Science and Operations Research 46
Replace S. Chambers with:
S. Chambers United Kingdom
Gül Başaran Türkiye
Silvia Rizzi Denmark
Ning Ning United States
Arduino Verdecchia Italy
Patrik Hesselius Sweden
Tara Maddala United States
Katja Wolf Germany
John E.L. Wong Singapore
Jaione Etxeberria Spain
William Jonas relative to S. Chambers United Kingdom S. Chambers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
S. Chambers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Jonas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Jonas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Jonas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Jonas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Jonas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Jonas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Jonas. The network helps show where William Jonas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Jonas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Jonas Line = papers co-authored together William Jonas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2007148
2
Social Justice Report, 1999. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, HREOC. Report to the Attorney-General as Required by Section 46C(1)(a) of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986.
1999126
3 201283
4
Coercive Reconciliation. Stabilise, Normalise, Exit Aboriginal Australia [Altman, Jon and Hinkson, Melinda (eds) (2007). Comments by the editors and by Behrendt, Larissa and Watson, Nicole at the book's Canberra launch with a review by Jonas, Bill.]
200721
5 201414
6 201113
7 20123
8 20102

About William Jonas

William Jonas is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology, Hematology, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (2 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (1 paper), Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (1 paper), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (1 paper) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (122 citations), Health (72 citations), Internal Medicine (23 citations), Hematology (66 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (46 citations). William Jonas has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Fadlo R. Khuri, Mourad Tighiouart, André Rogatko, Alan L. Porter, David J. Schoeneck, Nigel S. Key, Gowthami M. Arepally, Nigel Mackman, Raj S. Kasthuri and Troy A. McEachron. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood, Clinical Breast Cancer, Cancer Research and Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact