William Hurtle

12 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

William Hurtle
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 117
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 99
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 74
  • Spectroscopy 43
  • Infectious Diseases 41
Replace Mahmoud Darweesh with:
Mahmoud Darweesh Egypt
Alexey A. Chistov Russia
Tye O. Boynton United States
Mohamed Elaish United States
Bingsheng Qiu China
Sonalika Mahajan India
Yucheng Huang China
Jeremy Schefers United States
Danielle K. Offerdahl United States
Diego S. Ferrero Spain
William Hurtle relative to Mahmoud Darweesh Egypt Mahmoud Darweesh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.1×
Mahmoud Darweesh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Hurtle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Hurtle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hurtle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hurtle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Hurtle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hurtle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hurtle. The network helps show where William Hurtle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Hurtle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Hurtle Line = papers co-authored together William Hurtle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2004108
2 200459
3 201336
4 200232
5 200832
6 201729
7 200321
8 200316
9 201814
10 202211
11 20193
12 20201
13 20220

About William Hurtle

William Hurtle is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (8 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (8 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (6 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (3 papers), Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (3 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (2 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (2 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (117 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (99 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (74 citations), Spectroscopy (43 citations) and Infectious Diseases (41 citations). William Hurtle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Norwood, Erik A. Henchal, Bonnie M. Loveless, David A. Kulesh, Nick J. Knowles, Tammy R. Beckham, John G. Neilan, José Barrera, Luther Lindler and Wei Fan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Viruses, Vaccine, Journal of Virology and BioTechniques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact