William Griffiths

34 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers

William Griffiths
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 179
  • Global and Planetary Change 255
  • Ecology 254
  • Aquatic Science 65
  • Atmospheric Science 133
Replace Ingrid Peterson with:
Ingrid Peterson Canada
James R. Welch Brazil
Manuel C. Gomes Portugal
S. Jeanette Clark United States
Rosalind Goudie Canada
Andrew Black South Africa
Daniel Thompson United States
Larissa-A. Dehn United States
Kimberly T. Murray United States
Andrew Storey Australia
William Griffiths relative to Ingrid Peterson Canada Ingrid Peterson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ingrid Peterson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Griffiths

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Griffiths

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Griffiths. The network helps show where William Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Griffiths, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Griffiths Line = papers co-authored together William Griffiths links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982170
2 198972
3 200758
4 196055
5 199549
6 200736
7 198426
8 199023
9 199720
10 199217
11 198516
12 199216
13 197216
14 200814
15 19989
16 19948
17 19998
18 19647
19 19965
20 19813

About William Griffiths

William Griffiths is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, General Health Professions, Ecology and Aquatic Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (12 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (9 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (5 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Marine animal studies overview (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers) and Food Industry and Aquatic Biology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (179 citations), Global and Planetary Change (255 citations), Ecology (254 citations), Aquatic Science (65 citations) and Atmospheric Science (133 citations). William Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Craig, H. McElderry, Lewis J. Haldorson, Andie L. Knutson, Benny J. Gallaway, D. M. Schell, Didier Pittet, William Julius Wilson, Ousmane Traoré and Stéphane Hugonnet. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, The Journal of Psychology, Journal of School Health and Marine Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact