William Graebner

56 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

William Graebner
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • General Psychology 26
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 25
  • Music 55
  • Demography 111
  • Public Administration 30
Replace Joseph M. Hawes with:
Joseph M. Hawes United States
Howard P. Chudacoff United States
Arthur Marwick United Kingdom
David L. Westby United States
Richard F. Hamilton United States
William L. O’Neill United States
Paul Buhle United States
Gary Gerstle United States
Michael Frisch United States
August Meier United States
William Graebner relative to Joseph M. Hawes United States Joseph M. Hawes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
Joseph M. Hawes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Graebner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Graebner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Graebner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Graebner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Graebner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Graebner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Graebner. The network helps show where William Graebner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside William Graebner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Graebner Line = papers co-authored together William Graebner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993102
2 198276
3 198166
4 198151
5 198545
6 199742
7
True stories from the American past
199339
8 197733
9 198622
10 197721
11 198118
12 198418
13 198917
14 198014
15 199212
16 198110
17 199210
18 19889
19 20027
20 19747

About William Graebner

William Graebner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History, Political Science and International Relations, Demography and Marketing, having authored 67 papers that have together received 745 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (7 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (5 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (5 papers), American History and Culture (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (4 papers), Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (26 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (25 citations), Music (55 citations), Demography (111 citations) and Public Administration (30 citations). William Graebner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence Grossberg, Daniel T. Rodgers, Carole Haber, Sandra Burman, P. W. J. Bartrip, Ari Hoogenboom, W. Andrew Achenbaum, Theodore R. Mitchell, Richard H. K. Vietor and Elliott West. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, History of Education Quarterly, Industrial and Labor Relations Review and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact