William Goldring

3.0k citations
27 papers · 639 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

William Goldring

27 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers

William Goldring
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Nephrology 77
  • Biotechnology 91
  • Organic Chemistry 283
  • Pharmacology 143
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 101
Replace Philip R. Kastner with:
Philip R. Kastner United States
Jack M. DeForrest United States
Eriko Suzuki Japan
HAKAN F. G. BEVING Sweden
Lisa M. Antes United States
Kazunori Yoshida Japan
George Lukas Switzerland
Marie‐Hélène Antoine Belgium
Burak Cem Soner Türkiye
Qiaoling Wang China
William Goldring relative to Philip R. Kastner United States Philip R. Kastner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Philip R. Kastner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Goldring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Goldring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Goldring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Goldring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Goldring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Goldring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Goldring. The network helps show where William Goldring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Goldring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Goldring Line = papers co-authored together William Goldring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1958126
2 196279
3 200656
4 200345
5 199845
6 200244
7 195637
8 200430
9 199930
10 200321
11 196518
12 200917
13 200916
14 200514
15 201211
16 201011
17 19538
18 19966
19 20155
20 20235

About William Goldring

William Goldring is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (9 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (6 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (4 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (3 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (77 citations), Biotechnology (91 citations), Organic Chemistry (283 citations), Pharmacology (143 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (101 citations). William Goldring has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gerald Pattenden, Herbert Chasis, William H. Hulet, David S. Baldwin, Larry Weiler, Albert W. Biggs, C. M. Diaper, Pierre Bopp, George E. Schreiner and Margaret Ann Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Chemical Communications, Tetrahedron and Organic Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact