William Gilmer
Impact in
- Neurology top 2%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Neurological disorders and treatments
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Papers in
-
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 4
-
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 2
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Sarah H. Lisanby (4 shared papers)Lauren B. Marangell (2 shared papers)Andrew D. Krystal (3 shared papers)Mustafa M. Husain (3 shared papers)Elliott Richelson (1 shared paper)Harold A. Sackeïm (1 shared paper)Peter B. Rosenquist (1 shared paper)Scott T. Aaronson (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Brain stimulation (3 papers)Journal of Affective Disorders (2 papers)Neurology (1 paper)Pharmacopsychiatry (1 paper)Depression and Anxiety (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaAustralia
In The Last Decade
William Gilmer
10 papers receiving 564 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Neurology 325
- Psychiatry and Mental health 191
- Biological Psychiatry 28
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 46
- Pharmacology 107
Countries citing papers authored by William Gilmer
This map shows the geographic impact of William Gilmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Gilmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Gilmer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Gilmer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Gilmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Gilmer. The network helps show where William Gilmer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Gilmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 249 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 128 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 2 |
About William Gilmer
William Gilmer is a scholar working on Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 589 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (1 paper), Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (1 paper) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (325 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (191 citations), Biological Psychiatry (28 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (46 citations) and Pharmacology (107 citations). William Gilmer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sarah H. Lisanby, Lauren B. Marangell, Andrew D. Krystal, Mustafa M. Husain, Elliott Richelson, Harold A. Sackeïm, Peter B. Rosenquist, Scott T. Aaronson, Mark S. George and Daniel F. Maixner. Their work appears in journals such as Brain stimulation, Journal of Affective Disorders, Neurology, Pharmacopsychiatry and Depression and Anxiety.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.