William Gilmer
Impact in
- Neurology top 2%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Neurological disorders and treatments
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies 5
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 3
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 1
-
- Treatment of Major Depression 5
- Co-authors
- Sarah H. Lisanby (3 shared papers)Lauren B. Marangell (2 shared papers)Andrew D. Krystal (2 shared papers)Mustafa M. Husain (2 shared papers)Peter B. Rosenquist (2 shared papers)Zafiris J. Daskalakis (1 shared paper)Scott T. Aaronson (1 shared paper)Harold A. Sackeïm (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Brain stimulation (2 papers)Journal of Affective Disorders (2 papers)Neurology (1 paper)Neuropsychopharmacology (1 paper)Pharmacopsychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileAustralia
In The Last Decade
William Gilmer
9 papers receiving 531 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Neurology 326
- Psychiatry and Mental health 289
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 93
- Biological Psychiatry 40
- Pharmacology 163
Countries citing papers authored by William Gilmer
This map shows the geographic impact of William Gilmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Gilmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Gilmer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Gilmer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Gilmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Gilmer. The network helps show where William Gilmer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Gilmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 237 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 117 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 67 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 7 |
About William Gilmer
William Gilmer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Neurology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (5 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (326 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (289 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (93 citations), Biological Psychiatry (40 citations) and Pharmacology (163 citations). William Gilmer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sarah H. Lisanby, Lauren B. Marangell, Andrew D. Krystal, Mustafa M. Husain, Peter B. Rosenquist, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Scott T. Aaronson, Harold A. Sackeïm, Mark S. George and Elliott Richelson. Their work appears in journals such as Brain stimulation, Journal of Affective Disorders, Neurology, Neuropsychopharmacology and Pharmacopsychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.