William G. Eckert
Impact in
- Archeology top 2%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
-
- Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes 30
-
- Historical and Scientific Studies 19
- Co-authors
- Stuart H. James (4 shared papers)Thomas T. Noguchi (4 shared papers)Vincent J.M. DiMaio (1 shared paper)Joel B. Kirkpatrick (1 shared paper)Robert R. Hazelwood (1 shared paper)Joshua A. Perper (2 shared papers)Mark L. Taff (2 shared papers)Joe J. Lin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology (48 papers)CHEST Journal (1 paper)CRC Press eBooks (6 papers)PubMed (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William G. Eckert
43 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Archeology 129
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 156
- Emergency Medicine 51
- Genetics 30
- Insect Science 28
Countries citing papers authored by William G. Eckert
This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Eckert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Eckert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Eckert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Eckert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Eckert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Eckert. The network helps show where William G. Eckert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside William G. Eckert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 87 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 62 | |
| 3 | Interpretation of Bloodstain Evidence at Crime Scenes | 1989 | 56 |
| 4 | 1984 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 37 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 26 | |
| 8 | 1978 | 25 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 15 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1986 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1982 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 7 |
About William G. Eckert
William G. Eckert is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, History and Philosophy of Science, Toxicology and Archeology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (30 papers), Historical and Scientific Studies (19 papers), History of Science and Medicine (11 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (6 papers), Legal processes and jurisprudence (5 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (5 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (5 papers) and Medical History and Innovations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (129 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (156 citations), Emergency Medicine (51 citations), Genetics (30 citations) and Insect Science (28 citations). William G. Eckert has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stuart H. James, Thomas T. Noguchi, Vincent J.M. DiMaio, Joel B. Kirkpatrick, Robert R. Hazelwood, Joshua A. Perper, Mark L. Taff, Joe J. Lin, Werner U. Spitz and Ronald F. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, CHEST Journal, CRC Press eBooks, PubMed and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.