William G. Cale

837 citations
21 papers · 681 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William G. Cale

21 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

William G. Cale
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Environmental Engineering 285
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 171
  • Global and Planetary Change 275
  • Ecological Modeling 43
  • Ecology 142
Replace Peter Slaughter with:
Peter Slaughter United States
Paul H. Hiemstra Netherlands
Alessandro Ludovisi Italy
Stephen Tennenbaum United States
Erin M. Schliep United States
J. Douglas Steventon Canada
John David United States
Wilfried F. Wolff United States
Sten Folving Italy
Andrew Bray United States
William G. Cale relative to Peter Slaughter United States Peter Slaughter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Peter Slaughter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Cale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Cale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Cale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Cale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Cale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Cale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Cale. The network helps show where William G. Cale may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside William G. Cale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William G. Cale Line = papers co-authored together William G. Cale links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976215
2 1989124
3 1982109
4 198353
5 197928
6 198025
7 198323
8 198817
9 198616
10 199015
11 198812
12 19879
13 19917
14 19917
15 19886
16 19804
17 19884
18 19793
19 19882
20 19861

About William G. Cale

William G. Cale is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis (6 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (3 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (2 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (285 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (171 citations), Global and Planetary Change (275 citations), Ecological Modeling (43 citations) and Ecology (142 citations). William G. Cale has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R. V. O’Neill, Robert H. Gardner, Bernard C. Patten, John T. Finn, Robert W. Bosserman, J. Alan Yeakley, Geoffrey M. Henebry, Patrick L. Odell, John J. Warwick and Martin T. Katzman. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Modelling, BioScience, Journal of Environmental Engineering, Journal of Theoretical Biology and Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact