William Fuchs

892 citations
28 papers · 413 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William Fuchs

24 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

William Fuchs
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Management Science and Operations Research 184
  • Finance 132
  • Economics and Econometrics 290
  • Accounting 92
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 50
Replace John A. Weinberg with:
John A. Weinberg United States
Şevin Yeltekin United States
Paul Povel United States
Jordi Mondria Canada
Jérôme Mathis France
George Bulkley United Kingdom
David Laster United States
Rohit Rahi United Kingdom
Felipe Varas United States
Marios A. Panayides United States
William Fuchs relative to John A. Weinberg United States John A. Weinberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
John A. Weinberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Fuchs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Fuchs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Fuchs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Fuchs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Fuchs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Fuchs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Fuchs. The network helps show where William Fuchs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside William Fuchs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Fuchs Line = papers co-authored together William Fuchs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201566
2 201064
3 200635
4 201634
5 201730
6 201326
7 201625
8 200622
9 201916
10 201514
11 201514
12 201314
13 201311
14 201910
15 20158
16 20104
17
Costs and Bene…ts of Dynamic Trading in a Lemons Market VERY PRELIMINARY
20124
18 20204
19 20223
20 20193

About William Fuchs

William Fuchs is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Safety Research, having authored 28 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (15 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (9 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (6 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (4 papers), Game Theory and Applications (4 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (184 citations), Finance (132 citations), Economics and Econometrics (290 citations), Accounting (92 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (50 citations). William Fuchs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrzej Skrzypacz, Brett Green, Francesco Lippi, Dimitris Papanikolaou, Luis Garicano, David L. Levine, Jangwoo Lee and David I. Levine. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Theory, American Economic Review, American Economic Journal Microeconomics, Journal of Financial Economics and Theoretical Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact