William E. Studdiford

698 citations
11 papers · 125 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Studdiford

10 papers receiving 95 citations

Peers

William E. Studdiford
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 31
  • Reproductive Medicine 13
  • Rheumatology 18
  • Surgery 42
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 16
Replace Alex S. Tulsky with:
Alex S. Tulsky United States
Houston S. Everett United States
Thomas M. Dean United States
F. Franchi France
James B. Lyon United States
D. Gallot France
V. Lejeune France
John K. Ormond United States
Seth Levrant United States
Caterina A. Gregori United States
William E. Studdiford relative to Alex S. Tulsky United States Alex S. Tulsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alex S. Tulsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Studdiford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Studdiford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Studdiford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Studdiford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Studdiford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Studdiford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Studdiford. The network helps show where William E. Studdiford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside William E. Studdiford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Studdiford Line = papers co-authored together William E. Studdiford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 195651
2 195730
3 195516
4 19547
5 19537
6
Fetal and neonatal risks related to cesarean section.
19525
7 19542
8 19542
9 19512
10 19542
11 19541

About William E. Studdiford

William E. Studdiford is a scholar working on Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 11 papers that have together received 125 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (1 paper), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (1 paper) and Ureteral procedures and complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (31 citations), Reproductive Medicine (13 citations), Rheumatology (18 citations), Surgery (42 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (16 citations). William E. Studdiford has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gordon W. Douglas, Wayne H. Decker and Herbert S. Kupperman. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The American Journal of Surgery, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Surgical Clinics of North America and Postgraduate Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact