William E. Stempsey
Impact in
- Family Practice top 10%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Philosophy top 5%
- Mental Health and Psychiatry
Papers in
-
- Ethics in medical practice 16
-
- Empathy and Medical Education 10
- Co-authors
- Bettina Pikó (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Medicine Health Care and Philosophy (9 papers)Metamedicine (4 papers)Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality (3 papers)The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine (2 papers)American Journal of Clinical Pathology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHungary
In The Last Decade
William E. Stempsey
27 papers receiving 207 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Family Practice 22
- Philosophy 59
- General Health Professions 90
- Psychiatry and Mental health 50
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 71
Countries citing papers authored by William E. Stempsey
This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Stempsey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Stempsey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Stempsey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Stempsey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Stempsey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Stempsey. The network helps show where William E. Stempsey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside William E. Stempsey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 5 |
About William E. Stempsey
William E. Stempsey is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 29 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (16 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (10 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (22 citations), Philosophy (59 citations), General Health Professions (90 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (50 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (71 citations). William E. Stempsey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Bettina Pikó. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, Metamedicine, Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine and American Journal of Clinical Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.