William E. Pracht

765 citations
11 papers · 538 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Pracht

11 papers receiving 477 citations

Peers

William E. Pracht
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computational Mechanics 189
  • Management Science and Operations Research 79
  • Management Information Systems 47
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 29
  • Earth-Surface Processes 27
Replace Arpit Agarwal with:
Arpit Agarwal United States
J. F. Louis United States
Richard Southwell United Kingdom
Alessio Guarino Italy
James Wong Australia
Karl Bury Canada
Zoheir Sabeur United Kingdom
Brian H. Gilding Netherlands
O. P. Sharma India
John Zhu Singapore
William E. Pracht relative to Arpit Agarwal United States Arpit Agarwal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Arpit Agarwal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Pracht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Pracht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Pracht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Pracht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Pracht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Pracht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Pracht. The network helps show where William E. Pracht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside William E. Pracht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Pracht Line = papers co-authored together William E. Pracht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 197594
2 197290
3 196866
4 199965
5 198850
6 197340
7 196640
8 198634
9 197133
10 199025
11 20021

About William E. Pracht

William E. Pracht is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 11 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (4 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (3 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (2 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (1 paper), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (1 paper) and Design Education and Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (189 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (79 citations), Management Information Systems (47 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (29 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (27 citations). William E. Pracht has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis H. Harlow, Bart J. Daly, James F. Courtney, Ravindra Krovi, Art Graesser and J. U. Brackbill. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Physics, Decision Sciences, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Decision Support Systems and The Physics of Fluids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact