William E. Harkins

406 citations
37 papers · 151 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Harkins

15 papers receiving 82 citations

Peers

William E. Harkins
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Language and Linguistics 47
  • Literature and Literary Theory 43
  • Linguistics and Language 13
  • Religious studies 14
  • Classics 7
Replace Cleanth Brooks with:
Cleanth Brooks United States
W. K. McNeil
Albert Gérard Belgium
John Biguenet
Hugh Shields Ireland
Gerard Manley Hopkins
Manfred Pfister Germany
Thomas R. Hart United States
Juan Eduardo Cirlot
Donald Wesling United States
William E. Harkins relative to Cleanth Brooks United States Cleanth Brooks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Cleanth Brooks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Harkins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Harkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Harkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Harkins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Harkins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Harkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Harkins. The network helps show where William E. Harkins may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside William E. Harkins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Harkins Line = papers co-authored together William E. Harkins links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197252
2 197448
3 19626
4 19545
5 19634
6 19574
7 19813
8 19523
9 19662
10 19602
11 19582
12 19652
13 19712
14 19812
15 19572
16 19911
17 19571
18 19511
19 19551
20 19521

About William E. Harkins

William E. Harkins is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Education and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 37 papers that have together received 151 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Linguistics and language evolution (12 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (6 papers), European Cultural and National Identity (5 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (4 papers), Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (2 papers), Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication (2 papers), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (2 papers) and Peacebuilding and International Security (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (47 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (43 citations), Linguistics and Language (13 citations), Religious studies (14 citations) and Classics (7 citations). William E. Harkins has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ewa M. Thompson, Krystyna Pomorska, Ladislav Matějka, Boris Uspensky, Vladimir Nabokov, Michael Heim, Serge A. Zenkovsky, René Wellek, Ernest J. Simmons and N. S. Trubetzkoy. Their work appears in journals such as The Slavic and East European Journal, The Russian Review, Slavic Review, The Modern Language Review and Modern Language Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact