William E. Ford

82 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

William E. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 600
  • Electrochemistry 271
  • Materials Chemistry 1.9k
  • Bioengineering 134
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 344
Replace Daniel L. Akins with:
Daniel L. Akins United States
Michael J. Cook United Kingdom
D. Oelkrug Germany
Yoav Eichen Israel
T. Mark McCleskey United States
Roman Boulatov United States
George C. Lisensky United States
Mark S. Workentin Canada
Jacques A. Delaire France
Walter Mahler United States
William E. Ford relative to Daniel L. Akins United States Daniel L. Akins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Daniel L. Akins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Ford. The network helps show where William E. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Ford Line = papers co-authored together William E. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987345
2 2004237
3 1992196
4 2001184
5 1998177
6 2002161
7 2002151
8 1988148
9 1990118
10 1989113
11 1978108
12 2014107
13 198797
14 199491
15 199480
16 197966
17 197963
18 199758
19 201153
20 198252

About William E. Ford

William E. Ford is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology and Electrochemistry, having authored 84 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (22 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (19 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (16 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (14 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (9 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (6 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (6 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (600 citations), Electrochemistry (271 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.9k citations), Bioengineering (134 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (344 citations). William E. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. J. Rodgers, Prashant V. Kamat, Jurina M. Wessels, Malcolm E. Kenney, O. Harnack, Akio Yasuda, Gordon Tollin, Melvin Calvin, Boris D. Rihter and John W. Otvos. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Langmuir and The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact