William E. Fogle

709 citations
20 papers · 578 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Fogle

20 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers

William E. Fogle
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 22
  • Condensed Matter Physics 191
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 305
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 41
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 98
Replace M.J. Delaney with:
M.J. Delaney United States
J. A. Seman Mexico
J. Radovanović Serbia
T. F. Finnegan United States
E. Taralli Italy
G. Döhler Germany
Christian Tanguy France
V. A. Kochelap Ukraine
M. Sundaram United States
Xingxiang Zhou China
William E. Fogle relative to M.J. Delaney United States M.J. Delaney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
M.J. Delaney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Fogle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Fogle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Fogle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Fogle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Fogle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Fogle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Fogle. The network helps show where William E. Fogle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Fogle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Fogle Line = papers co-authored together William E. Fogle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1997179
2 197294
3 200281
4 198353
5 198143
6 199438
7 198327
8 198720
9 200715
10 19827
11 19905
12 19974
13 19933
14 20013
15 19911
16 19981
17 19821
18 19931
19 19811
20 19901

About William E. Fogle

William E. Fogle is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (5 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (4 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (4 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (2 papers) and Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (22 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (191 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (305 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (41 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (98 citations). William E. Fogle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Soulen, Jerome H. Perlstein, J. H. Colwell, Norman E. Phillips, James D. Boyer, Robert A. Fisher, M. Durieux, G. E. Brodale, N. E. Phillips and E. D. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Physical Review Letters, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Physica B Condensed Matter and Physics Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact