William Dennes
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Papers in
-
- Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis 6
-
- Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy 4
- Co-authors
- Phillip R. Bennett (9 shared papers)Donna M. Slater (7 shared papers)Lucilla Poston (5 shared papers)Robert Sawdy (4 shared papers)Juan S. Campa (2 shared papers)V.C. Allport (2 shared papers)M.H.F. Sullivan (2 shared papers)Elena Kulinskaya (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Heart (2 papers)Placenta (2 papers)Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (1 paper)American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (1 paper)The Journal of Physiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
William Dennes
13 papers receiving 464 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 62
- Epidemiology 202
- Immunology 101
- Pharmacology 79
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 117
Countries citing papers authored by William Dennes
This map shows the geographic impact of William Dennes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Dennes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Dennes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Dennes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Dennes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Dennes. The network helps show where William Dennes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Dennes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 144 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 111 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 18 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 2 |
About William Dennes
William Dennes is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (6 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (4 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (1 paper), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (62 citations), Epidemiology (202 citations), Immunology (101 citations), Pharmacology (79 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (117 citations). William Dennes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Phillip R. Bennett, Donna M. Slater, Lucilla Poston, Robert Sawdy, Juan S. Campa, V.C. Allport, M.H.F. Sullivan, Elena Kulinskaya, R. Wimalasundera and Matthew J. Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Heart, Placenta, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.