William D. Thacker

638 citations
26 papers · 464 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William D. Thacker

26 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

William D. Thacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 144
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 212
  • Mathematical Physics 58
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 85
  • Computational Mechanics 106
Replace Tsutomu Imamura with:
Tsutomu Imamura Japan
T. Kamimura Japan
Victor Valentinovich Vedenyapin Russia
Nivaldo Agostinho Lemos Brazil
Masayoshi Tajiri Japan
T. P. Billam United Kingdom
Thierry Lehner France
Theo J. Schep Netherlands
E. Tassi France
Jörg Hennig Germany
William D. Thacker relative to Tsutomu Imamura Japan Tsutomu Imamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16×
Tsutomu Imamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William D. Thacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Thacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Thacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Thacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Thacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Thacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Thacker. The network helps show where William D. Thacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside William D. Thacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William D. Thacker Line = papers co-authored together William D. Thacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198990
2 200362
3 198547
4 198734
5 198727
6 199224
7 198923
8 198922
9 199318
10 198915
11 199712
12 200711
13 199010
14 200510
15 19878
16 19928
17 19847
18 20007
19 19996
20 19915

About William D. Thacker

William D. Thacker is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics, Computational Mechanics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (9 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (7 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (6 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (4 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (3 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers) and Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (144 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (212 citations), Mathematical Physics (58 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (85 citations) and Computational Mechanics (106 citations). William D. Thacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include E. Gozzi, A. O. Barut, Thomas B. Gatski, C. E. Grosch, C. David Pruett, Daniel Rohrlich, Joachim Kupsch, S. Sarkar, Thalanayar S. Santhanam and Christopher L. Rumsey. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, Physics of Fluids, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, Flow Turbulence and Combustion and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact