William Curtis

911 citations
42 papers · 491 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

William Curtis

36 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

William Curtis
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Architecture 62
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 77
  • Conservation 29
  • Archeology 72
  • Urban Studies 38
Replace Ingrid King with:
Ingrid King Australia
James Harris United States
Ruth Richardson United Kingdom
John Beck United States
Thomas Munro Canada
Aneta Sitek Poland
John Sulliván United States
Marta Licata Italy
Bogusław Antoszewski Poland
Gunther von Hagens Germany
William Curtis relative to Ingrid King Australia Ingrid King's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Ingrid King · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Curtis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Curtis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Curtis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Curtis. The network helps show where William Curtis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Curtis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Curtis Line = papers co-authored together William Curtis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Modern architecture since 1900
198268
2 198750
3 198348
4 198343
5 201338
6 201930
7 201821
8 201220
9 199419
10 200515
11 201515
12
La arquitectura moderna desde 1900
198615
13 199314
14 201412
15 202311
16 201910
17 19828
18 20187
19
Le Corbusier: ideas y formas
19875
20 19835

About William Curtis

William Curtis is a scholar working on Surgery, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Conservation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Architecture, having authored 42 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Architecture and Art History Studies (7 papers), Architecture, Modernity, and Design (3 papers), Historical Studies of Medieval Iberia (3 papers), Historical Art and Architecture Studies (3 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (2 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (2 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (2 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (62 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (77 citations), Conservation (29 citations), Archeology (72 citations) and Urban Studies (38 citations). William Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Vic Gray, Bruce B. Horswell, Samuel B. Frank, Daniel L. Orr, George F. Rick Hatch, Reza Omid, Alexander E. Weber, Sean P. Edwards, Meir Marmor and Joseph E. Van Sickels. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Oral Diseases and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact