Elena Stein

718 citations
34 papers · 484 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Elena Stein

33 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Elena Stein
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Applied Psychology 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 162
  • Clinical Psychology 217
  • Neurology 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 88
Replace Hannah L. Combs with:
Hannah L. Combs United States
Miji Um United States
Angelina Isabella Mellentin Denmark
Anna M. Ehret Germany
Lalitha Iyadurai Sweden
Martin Gevonden Netherlands
Aleksander H. Erga Norway
Lauren B. McSweeney United States
Ashley N. Clausen United States
Elena Stein relative to Hannah L. Combs United States Hannah L. Combs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Hannah L. Combs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elena Stein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elena Stein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elena Stein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elena Stein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elena Stein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elena Stein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elena Stein. The network helps show where Elena Stein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elena Stein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elena Stein Line = papers co-authored together Elena Stein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201946
2 202045
3 201834
4 202033
5 201831
6 201729
7 202028
8 201823
9 202023
10 201922
11 201818
12 202117
13 202016
14 202216
15 201912
16 201912
17 202211
18 201811
19 20209
20 20238

About Elena Stein

Elena Stein is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Epidemiology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (11 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (10 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (68 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (162 citations), Clinical Psychology (217 citations), Neurology (49 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (88 citations). Elena Stein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Katie Witkiewitz, Victoria R. Votaw, Corey R. Roos, Adam D. Wilson, Sarah Bowen, Matthew R. Pearson, Vincent P. Clark, Eric D. Claus, Kevin A. Hallgren and Megan Kirouac. Their work appears in journals such as Mindfulness, Addictive Behaviors, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research and Current Addiction Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact