William Coath
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 13
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 8
- Co-authors
- David M. Cash (17 shared papers)Ashvini Keshavan (11 shared papers)Christopher Lane (6 shared papers)Jonathan M. Schott (13 shared papers)Nick C. Fox (13 shared papers)Heidi Murray‐Smith (10 shared papers)Sarah M. Buchanan (7 shared papers)Sarah E Keuss (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (4 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring (3 papers)Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (3 papers)Neurology (2 papers)Brain Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenNetherlands
In The Last Decade
William Coath
16 papers receiving 213 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Psychiatry and Mental health 142
- Physiology 115
- Sensory Systems 16
- Neurology 24
- Cognitive Neuroscience 50
Countries citing papers authored by William Coath
This map shows the geographic impact of William Coath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Coath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Coath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Coath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Coath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Coath. The network helps show where William Coath may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Coath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 59 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 0 |
About William Coath
William Coath is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (142 citations), Physiology (115 citations), Sensory Systems (16 citations), Neurology (24 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (50 citations). William Coath has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David M. Cash, Ashvini Keshavan, Christopher Lane, Jonathan M. Schott, Nick C. Fox, Heidi Murray‐Smith, Sarah M. Buchanan, Sarah E Keuss, Thomas D. Parker and Sarah‐Naomi James. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Neurology and Brain Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.