Heidi Murray‐Smith

1.4k citations
38 papers · 948 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Heidi Murray‐Smith

38 papers receiving 929 citations

Peers

Heidi Murray‐Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 677
  • Physiology 168
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 104
  • Neurology 59
  • Neurology 23
Replace Kirsty Lu with:
Kirsty Lu United Kingdom
Sarah E Keuss United Kingdom
William Coath United Kingdom
Sarah M. Buchanan United Kingdom
Emilie T. Reas United States
Alejandra Machado Sweden
Anita M. Devlin United Kingdom
Nicholas Kozauer United States
Aikaterini Xekardaki Switzerland
Alfonso J. Alfini United States
Heidi Murray‐Smith relative to Kirsty Lu United Kingdom Kirsty Lu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Kirsty Lu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Heidi Murray‐Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heidi Murray‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heidi Murray‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heidi Murray‐Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heidi Murray‐Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heidi Murray‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heidi Murray‐Smith. The network helps show where Heidi Murray‐Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Heidi Murray‐Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Heidi Murray‐Smith Line = papers co-authored together Heidi Murray‐Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019195
2 202091
3 201982
4 201780
5 201848
6 201946
7 200942
8 202137
9 202234
10 202129
11 201926
12 202226
13 201925
14 202125
15 202019
16 202018
17 202114
18 201913
19 202011
20 20219

About Heidi Murray‐Smith

Heidi Murray‐Smith is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 38 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (35 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (1 paper) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (677 citations), Physiology (168 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (104 citations), Neurology (59 citations) and Neurology (23 citations). Heidi Murray‐Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan M. Schott, Nick C. Fox, Ashvini Keshavan, Thomas D. Parker, Sarah E Keuss, Sarah M. Buchanan, Marcus Richards, Sarah‐Naomi James, David M. Cash and Andrew Wong. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Brain Communications and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact