William Cibulas

444 citations
15 papers · 356 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Cibulas

15 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

William Cibulas
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 206
  • Chemical Health and Safety 3
  • Cancer Research 42
  • Toxicology 12
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 24
Replace C.T. De Rosa with:
C.T. De Rosa United States
Dustin F. Kapraun United States
Kunio Kawashima Japan
Annsofi Nihlén Sweden
Hélène Guiraud France
Cynthia Graham United States
Herman C. Price United States
John T. Szilagyi United States
Sara C. Lloyd United States
Michael P. Firestone United States
William Cibulas relative to C.T. De Rosa United States C.T. De Rosa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
C.T. De Rosa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Cibulas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Cibulas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Cibulas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Cibulas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Cibulas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Cibulas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Cibulas. The network helps show where William Cibulas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Cibulas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Cibulas Line = papers co-authored together William Cibulas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1996121
2 200462
3 199845
4 200231
5 198624
6 198616
7 198111
8 198811
9 200210
10 19937
11 20046
12 19954
13 19953
14
Neurodevelopmental effects: making the case for biologic plausibility.
20003
15 19992

About William Cibulas

William Cibulas is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Toxicology, Physiology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (6 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (6 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (5 papers), Occupational exposure and asthma (3 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper), Public Health and Environmental Issues (1 paper) and Environmental Science and Water Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (206 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (3 citations), Cancer Research (42 citations), Toxicology (12 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (24 citations). William Cibulas has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include M. Moiz Mumtaz, Hisham A El-Masri, Christopher T. De Rosa, C.T. De Rosa, Hana R. Pohl, Barry L. Johnson, Dennis E. Jones, Heraline E. Hicks, Stuart M. Brooks and Allen Vinegar. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology and Industrial Health, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, Environmental Research, Chemosphere and Journal of Great Lakes Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact