Toxicology and Industrial Health

2.6k papers and 47.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Toxicology and Industrial Health in the last decades have received a total of 47.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Toxicology and Industrial Health usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.1k papers), Plant Science (439 papers) and Cancer Research (425 papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (406 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (323 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (307 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Toxicology and Industrial Health are L. Earl Gray, Joseph Ostby, Claudia S. Miller, Hasan Türkez, Robert P. Beliles, Mehmet Kanter, Ronald P. Brown, Stan L. Lindstedt, Lorenz R. Rhomberg and Michael D. Delp.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Toxicology and Industrial Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Toxicology and Industrial Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Toxicology and Industrial Health.

Countries where authors publish in Toxicology and Industrial Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Toxicology and Industrial Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Toxicology and Industrial Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toxicology and Industrial Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025