William Cain

47 papers receiving 775 citations

Peers

William Cain
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Health Informatics 27
  • Computer Science Applications 117
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 283
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 379
  • Condensed Matter Physics 124
Replace Stefan Küchemann with:
Stefan Küchemann Germany
Sebastian Brückner Germany
Jonte Bernhard Sweden
Ïlbilge Dökme Türkiye
Scott Daniel Australia
Junjie Gavin Wu China
D. Olguı́n Mexico
Raúl Marticorena Sánchez Spain
Osamu Takeuchi Japan
Gaurav Nanda United States
William Cain relative to Stefan Küchemann Germany Stefan Küchemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
Stefan Küchemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Cain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Cain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Cain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Cain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Cain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Cain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Cain. The network helps show where William Cain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Cain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Cain Line = papers co-authored together William Cain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2023113
2 1990109
3 1996105
4 201474
5 198751
6 198744
7 199134
8 198827
9 201325
10 201522
11 201619
12 201617
13 201515
14 198914
15 199212
16 201412
17 199412
18 199011
19 201410
20 202010

About William Cain

William Cain is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (13 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (10 papers), Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (6 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (27 citations), Computer Science Applications (117 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (283 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (379 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (124 citations). William Cain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include M.H. Kryder, John Bell, A. P. Payne, R. Hempstead, Punya Mishra, Danah Henriksen, W. H. Meiklejohn, Neil Smith, A. Layadi and J. O. Artman. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, TechTrends, Journal of Applied Physics, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal and College English.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact