William C. Lin

437 citations
14 papers · 341 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

William C. Lin

14 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

William C. Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Automotive Engineering 279
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 102
  • Control and Systems Engineering 98
  • Mechanical Engineering 129
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 30
Replace Karl Naab with:
Karl Naab Germany
Maurizio Paschero Italy
Myung‐Won Suh South Korea
Andrei Aksjonov Estonia
Yuen-Kwok Chin United States
Diomidis Katzourakis Netherlands
Edward Holweg Netherlands
Fazal Syed United States
Yulong Liu China
Naohiro Yuhara Japan
William C. Lin relative to Karl Naab Germany Karl Naab's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Karl Naab · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Lin. The network helps show where William C. Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside William C. Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William C. Lin Line = papers co-authored together William C. Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201078
2 200075
3 200567
4 199231
5 200520
6 198519
7 200815
8
A descriptive semantic analysis of the mandarin aspect-tense system
19797
9 20087
10 20056
11 20076
12 20094
13 20044
14 19842

About William C. Lin

William C. Lin is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 14 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems (8 papers), Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (5 papers), Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research (4 papers), Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (3 papers), Traffic control and management (3 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper) and Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (279 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (102 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (98 citations), Mechanical Engineering (129 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (30 citations). William C. Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and China. Frequent co-authors include Yuen-Kwok Chin, Yilu Zhang, Shih-Ken Chen, Konghui Guo, Ye Zhuang, Jihua Huang, Norman Bucknor, Nancy L. Johnson, Chandra Namuduri and Zongxuan Sun. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Vehicle System Dynamics, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, RELC Journal and International Journal of Vehicle Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact