William Brucker

945 citations
8 papers · 624 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Ecology top 5%
    • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
    • Microbial infections and disease research

Papers in

William Brucker

8 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers

William Brucker
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Ecology 433
  • Microbiology 87
  • Endocrinology 39
  • Molecular Biology 390
  • Microbiology 4
Replace Katarzyna Leskinen with:
Katarzyna Leskinen Finland
Evgeny Klimuk Russia
Tomoko Mihara Japan
Steven J. Zullo United States
Michael Schirm Canada
Megan Sjodt United States
Erin Wall United States
Sunghee Chai Germany
Thorsten Grebe United States
Svetlana Chabelskaya France
William Brucker relative to Katarzyna Leskinen Finland Katarzyna Leskinen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Katarzyna Leskinen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Brucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Brucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Brucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Brucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Brucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Brucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Brucker. The network helps show where William Brucker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Brucker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Brucker Line = papers co-authored together William Brucker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2003495
2 200978
3 201815
4 202014
5 202313
6 20205
7 20223
8 20241

About William Brucker

William Brucker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Nephrology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (1 paper), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (1 paper), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (1 paper), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (433 citations), Microbiology (87 citations), Endocrinology (39 citations), Molecular Biology (390 citations) and Microbiology (4 citations). William Brucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and India. Frequent co-authors include João A. Paulo, Edward Hawrot, Jennifer M. Houtz, Roger W. Hendrix, Jeffrey Lawrence, Michael E. Ford, Jordan Kriakov, Vanaja Kumar, Debbie Jacobs-Sera and Nicholas R. Pannunzio. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Clinics of North America, Cell, Journal of Proteome Research, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease and American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact