William Braden

697 citations
21 papers · 549 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William Braden

20 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

William Braden
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 208
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 130
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 132
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 92
  • Clinical Psychology 127
Replace T. H. Scott with:
T. H. Scott Canada
Jeanne G. Gilbert United States
Lawrence Kayton United States
Stephanie Portnoy United States
Felix Post Germany
G. F. Reed United Kingdom
Jakob Hein Germany
Thomas G. Stampfl United States
Audrey S. Bahrick United States
William Braden relative to T. H. Scott Canada T. H. Scott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
T. H. Scott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Braden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Braden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Braden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Braden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Braden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Braden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Braden. The network helps show where William Braden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside William Braden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Braden Line = papers co-authored together William Braden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198391
2 198486
3 198972
4 195661
5 198446
6 198237
7 198632
8 198423
9 198115
10
Predicting pharmacotherapy outcome by subjective response.
198213
11 197413
12 196812
13
Racing thoughts in depressed patients.
19799
14 19707
15
Diagnosing mania: the use of family informants.
19807
16 19836
17 19826
18 19845
19 19714
20 19684

About William Braden

William Braden is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy and History, having authored 21 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (208 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (130 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (132 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (92 citations) and Clinical Psychology (127 citations). William Braden has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Haier, David L. Robinson, D.G. Williams, Steven A. Rasmussen, Paul Malloy, Maxine Krengel, Arnold H. Buss, Walter A. Brown, Steven Klee and Barry D. Garfinkel. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Psychiatry Research, American Sociological Review, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Review of Religious Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact