D.G. Williams

762 citations
17 papers · 612 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

D.G. Williams

17 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

D.G. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Applied Psychology 119
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 237
  • Pharmacy 56
  • Social Psychology 194
  • Clinical Psychology 187
Replace Myra J. Cooper with:
Myra J. Cooper United Kingdom
Klaske A. Glashouwer Netherlands
Matt McGue United States
Sharon L. Berry United States
Nadja Heym United Kingdom
Asmir Gračanin Croatia
Joseph D. LaBarbera United States
Tanya Vacharkulksemsuk United States
Leentje Vervoort Belgium
Verena Ly Netherlands
D.G. Williams relative to Myra J. Cooper United Kingdom Myra J. Cooper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Myra J. Cooper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D.G. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.G. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.G. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.G. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.G. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.G. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.G. Williams. The network helps show where D.G. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside D.G. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D.G. Williams Line = papers co-authored together D.G. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 198391
2 198486
3 199272
4 199065
5 198954
6 199651
7 198044
8 198240
9 198134
10 198925
11 199316
12 198410
13 19828
14 19797
15 19734
16 19823
17 19892

About D.G. Williams

D.G. Williams is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (119 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (237 citations), Pharmacy (56 citations), Social Psychology (194 citations) and Clinical Psychology (187 citations). D.G. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David L. Robinson, Richard J. Haier and William Braden. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, British Journal of Psychology, The Journal of Psychology, Addictive Behaviors and Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact