William Bowman

760 citations
4 papers · 34 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

William Bowman

3 papers receiving 26 citations

Peers

William Bowman
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 8
  • Emergency Medicine 6
  • Gender Studies 5
  • Economics and Econometrics 11
  • Political Science and International Relations 8
Replace Thomas Nixon Carver with:
Thomas Nixon Carver New Zealand
Peter Holbrook United States
Esther Wright United Kingdom
Laure Kaluzinski France
Alfred Boss Germany
R. Jayaram India
Deborah F. Oliver United States
Fernando Carvalho Neuenschwander Brazil
M. Mariñán Gorospe Spain
B Cros Spain
William Bowman relative to Thomas Nixon Carver New Zealand Thomas Nixon Carver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Thomas Nixon Carver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Bowman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Bowman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Bowman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Bowman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Bowman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Bowman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Bowman. The network helps show where William Bowman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside William Bowman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Bowman Line = papers co-authored together William Bowman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1
The All-Volunteer Force After a Decade: Retrospect and Prospect
198617
2 19809
3 19938
4 20080

About William Bowman

William Bowman is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 4 papers that have together received 34 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (1 paper), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (1 paper), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper), Historical and Scientific Studies (1 paper), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (1 paper), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (8 citations), Emergency Medicine (6 citations), Gender Studies (5 citations), Economics and Econometrics (11 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (8 citations). William Bowman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Young, R.D. Farley, Tim Davis, David H. Newman and Thomas M Price. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Austrian History Yearbook and Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact