William Bowman
Impact in
-
- Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
-
- Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents 1
-
- Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management 1
- Co-authors
- David H. Newman (1 shared paper)Tim R.C. Davis (1 shared paper)Thomas M Price (1 shared paper)R.D. Farley (1 shared paper)Peter Young (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Surgical Endoscopy (1 paper)Journal of Hepatology (1 paper)Trends in Pharmacological Sciences (1 paper)Austrian History Yearbook (1 paper)Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William Bowman
5 papers receiving 187 citations
William Bowman's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 94
- Epidemiology 82
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 12
- Pharmacology 30
- Hepatology 9
Countries citing papers authored by William Bowman
This map shows the geographic impact of William Bowman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Bowman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Bowman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Bowman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Bowman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Bowman. The network helps show where William Bowman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside William Bowman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A phase IIa active-comparator-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efinopegdutide in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 163 |
| 2 | The All-Volunteer Force After a Decade: Retrospect and Prospect | 1986 | 18 |
| 3 | 1980 | 15 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 1 |
About William Bowman
William Bowman is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medicine, History, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Physiology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Military History and Strategy (1 paper), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (1 paper), Historical and Scientific Studies (1 paper), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (1 paper), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (1 paper) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (94 citations), Epidemiology (82 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (12 citations), Pharmacology (30 citations) and Hepatology (9 citations). William Bowman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David H. Newman, Tim R.C. Davis, Thomas M Price, R.D. Farley and Peter Young. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, Journal of Hepatology, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Austrian History Yearbook and Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.