William B.J. Cafferty

4.0k citations
41 papers · 3.1k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

William B.J. Cafferty

40 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

William B.J. Cafferty
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Developmental Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.1k
  • Neurology 338
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 629
  • Physiology 492
Replace Andrea Tedeschi with:
Andrea Tedeschi United States
Henry K. Yip Hong Kong
Yona Goldshmit Australia
M. Murray United States
Tetsuya Imura Japan
Carla Taveggia Italy
Shuxin Li United States
Lucien J. Houenou United States
Christian Göritz Sweden
Marietta McAtee United States
William B.J. Cafferty relative to Andrea Tedeschi United States Andrea Tedeschi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Andrea Tedeschi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William B.J. Cafferty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William B.J. Cafferty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William B.J. Cafferty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William B.J. Cafferty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William B.J. Cafferty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William B.J. Cafferty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William B.J. Cafferty. The network helps show where William B.J. Cafferty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William B.J. Cafferty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William B.J. Cafferty Line = papers co-authored together William B.J. Cafferty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005373
2 2005219
3 2004207
4 2010195
5 2007183
6 2001161
7 2006152
8 2008133
9 2006117
10 2011115
11 2009108
12 2000104
13 201399
14 200893
15 201175
16 201266
17 201764
18 201863
19 201459
20 200259

About William B.J. Cafferty

William B.J. Cafferty is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (27 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (18 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (12 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (11 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (3 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.1k citations), Neurology (338 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (629 citations) and Physiology (492 citations). William B.J. Cafferty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Stephen M. Strittmatter, Stephen B. McMahon, Steve Thompson, Philip Duffy, Fabien Marchand, Jin Qiu, Natalie J. Gardiner, Aaron W. McGee, Eric A. Huebner and Stéphane Budel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Experimental Neurology, Journal of Neurotrauma, Cell Reports and Neuron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact