William Baker
Impact in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Gene expression and cancer classification
- RNA modifications and cancer
- Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
-
- Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Papers in
-
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 1
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 1
- Irish and British Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Mark Knight (1 shared paper)Emma Mason (1 shared paper)William Clarke (1 shared paper)Neal R. Norrick (1 shared paper)Byron Anderson (1 shared paper)Peter Henderson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Library Review (3 papers)Neophilologus (1 paper)Nucleic Acids Research (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)English Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William Baker
12 papers receiving 786 citations
William Baker's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Molecular Biology 564
- Ecology 107
- Information Systems and Management 26
- Immunology 58
- Genetics 77
Countries citing papers authored by William Baker
This map shows the geographic impact of William Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Baker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Baker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Baker. The network helps show where William Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside William Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 790 |
| 2 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 3 | The letters of Wilkie Collins | 1999 | 10 |
| 4 | 2001 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 15 | Trotsky's Vision of Libraries. | 1991 | 0 |
About William Baker
William Baker is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations and Ecology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Translation Studies and Practices (1 paper), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (1 paper), Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (1 paper), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper) and Irish and British Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (564 citations), Ecology (107 citations), Information Systems and Management (26 citations), Immunology (58 citations) and Genetics (77 citations). William Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Knight, Emma Mason, William Clarke, Neal R. Norrick, Byron Anderson and Peter Henderson. Their work appears in journals such as Library Review, Neophilologus, Nucleic Acids Research, The Modern Language Review and English Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.