William Baker

979 citations
39 papers · 574 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

William Baker

36 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

William Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Biophysics 49
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 235
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 333
  • Polymers and Plastics 80
  • Structural Biology 4
Replace Kipp J. van Schooten with:
Kipp J. van Schooten United States
Benjamin Pollard United States
J. A. Dearo United States
Chengbing Qin China
Oleg Selig Netherlands
Marzieh Kavand United States
Özgün Süzer United States
Hannah L. Stern United Kingdom
Sam Schott United Kingdom
J. I. Thackara United States
William Baker relative to Kipp J. van Schooten United States Kipp J. van Schooten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kipp J. van Schooten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Baker. The network helps show where William Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Baker Line = papers co-authored together William Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010105
2 201160
3 201255
4 201849
5 201042
6 197239
7 201732
8 199921
9 201217
10 200916
11 201315
12 198515
13 199013
14 201512
15 201410
16 20159
17 20158
18 19808
19 20137
20 20015

About William Baker

William Baker is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biophysics, Spectroscopy and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 39 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (12 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (7 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (7 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (6 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (5 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (4 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (3 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (49 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (235 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (333 citations), Polymers and Plastics (80 citations) and Structural Biology (4 citations). William Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Boehme, Dane R. McCamey, John M. Lupton, Kipp J. van Schooten, Sang‐Yun Lee, Seoyoung Paik, M. Y. Simmons, S. K. Gorman, Matthew A. Broome and Matthew House. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B., The Journal of Urology and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact